So I'm gonna be a bit that annoying guy. @m15o created a new kind of journal spec (https://m15o.ichi.city/site/subscribing-to-a-journal-page.html) that seems to get some steam here. It's a clever idea, but it has some mild accessibility issues that you should keep in mind if you decide to use it.
First of all, using an <h2> tag for the date is semantically valid, but it's not a proper use of it. A title is supposed to explain what the content of the next paragraphs is going to be about. Using the date, it conveys nothing special.
So it's not the end of the world, but it's not super friendly either.
My advice would be: use a <time> with a human readable date and a datetime attr inside the <h2>. It's valid HTML according to the W3C validator, you can still use the computer date format for parsers.
Also if you are surprised by the fact that several <article> tags are used in the journal spec don't be, it's actually a good practice! https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2020/01/html5-article-section/
@thomasorus The spec seems to ignore tags (I had an image in my journal a couple of days ago and it cut off the p tag after it) that aren’t recognised. I might test this by adding a <time> and seeing if it cuts off the rest.
@thomasorus Thank you for the feedback! <time> is definitely something I considered using. Journals are strange in that their entries often don't have a title at all besides a date. Think physical diaries. In those, we just write the date and start writing. That motivated me to treat them as fully fledge titles. Hope this explains a bit the choice. :)
Revel in the marvels of the universe. We are a collective of forward-thinking individuals who strive to better ourselves and our surroundings through constant creation. We express ourselves through music, art, games, and writing. We also put great value in play. A warm welcome to any like-minded people who feel these ideals resonate with them.